The Dark Blight

Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, Batman!

I’ve been meaning to write a post about The Dark Knight for weeks, but between family vacations and working on the fall issue of Leadership, I’ve been swamped. I’m a big fan of superhero movies, and this summer I’ve seen a bunch—Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, and the latest installment of Christopher Nolan’s fantastic Batman series, The Dark Knight. My companion to most of these comic book movies is a psychiatrist from my church who has a penchant for professional wrestling and shares my follicle failings. (I highly recommend watching fantasy movies with a psychiatrist—it’s more fun than applying Freudian dream analysis to nursery rhymes.)

The Dark Knight PosterI feel no need to add my accolades for The Dark Knight to those already swirling around the web. (Check out Todd Hertz’s review at Instead, I want to discuss an interesting storytelling element of the film that may help explain one of the more mysterious elements of the Bible—emphasis on the word may. (Let’s not take a movie too seriously or read overly spiritual themes into it. That only spoils an otherwise good the film and risks diminishing our faith.)

Batman’s nemesis in The Dark Knight is the Joker, played by the late great Heath Ledger. Unlike earlier film depictions of the Clown Prince of Crime, Ledger’s Joker has no back-story, no origin, no narrative arc. In The Dark Knight, we never discover what would drive a man to dye his hair green, paint his face white, smear a ghastly smile across his cheeks and murder people for the sheer fun of it.

In Tim Burton’s 1989 Batman, the Joker, played by Jack Nicholson, is a mob boss who falls into a vat of chemicals that bleaches his skin, gives him a permanent grin, and loosens a few screws in his head. Nicholson’s Joker is the product of an accident. This knowledge humanizes the character, and despite his evil behavior the audience retains some degree of pity for the villain.

Not so in The Dark Knight. Director Christopher Nolan says he intentionally avoided giving the Joker any back-story in his movie. “He’s got no story arc,” says Nolan, “he’s just a force of nature tearing through [the film].” Co-writer David Goyer says there is no need for an origin for the Joker because, “He just is. He’s more interesting without it.”health Ledger's Joker

Nolan says a back-story for the Joker “would reduce the character. It’s more frightening because, in a sense, there is no mystery there…. He is exactly what he presents himself to be; which is an anarchist.” Nolan describes the Joker as a “mad dog”—a description carried into the film when the Joker describes himself as a dog chasing cars—he wouldn’t know what to do if he caught one.

How does this relate to the Bible? Well, Scripture is largely silent regarding the origins of the enemy and evil—the blight of sin that marks our world. We know how humanity rebelled against God and fell into sin through the deception of the serpent in the garden—but where did the serpent come from? If God created a perfect creation and declared all things “good,” how and when did evil appear on the scene?

Yes, I know Jesus says he saw Satan fall from heaven (Luke 10:18), but even he offers no real back-story, no explanation. I am also aware of the apocryphal writings that try to explain the evil one’s narrative arc and the popularity of such ideas with pop-evangelical fiction. But none of that changes the fact that scripture largely ignores the question—where did evil come from? Instead, the thrust of the Bible is focused on what God has done about it.

I wonder if the lack of a back-story for evil in the Bible is related to Nolan and Goyer’s rationale for ignoring the Joker’s back-story? Without an explanation or origin, God is emphasizing the utter meaninglessness and anarchy of evil. It cannot be understood; it cannot be rationalized. To do otherwise would be to legitimize its place in his creation or to create sympathy for an enemy that deserves none.

I recall sitting in a theology class in seminary where we debated the origins of evil. How could Adam and Eve even be tempted? After all, they were created in the image of God and completely pure. How did the serpent come to be in the garden? Why would God allow that?

After spending too much time debating these fruitless thoughts (which is the seminarian’s specialty), my professor finally interrupted with his wisdom. “Never ask a question the text doesn’t want to answer,” he said. He was correct, of course. They are brilliant words I try to remember with each sermon I write.

Before The Dark Knight’s premiere, comic book movie fanboys were all over the internet criticizing Nolan’s decision to not include a back-story for the Joker. They wanted the film to be faithful to the comics. They wanted their questions about Batman’s antagonist answered and expounded. Nolan refused because he had a higher goal than answering fanboys’ questions—he wanted to tell a great story.

Answers to all of our questions about the origin of evil are not found in the Scriptures, which means that God, the Writer and Director of this cosmic drama, did not deem them necessary for the story he wanted to tell. Are we satisfied with that, or must we continue to contrive answers for ourselves? My guess is that Christians would find themselves in less trouble theologically, culturally, and politically if we stuck with the questions God has chosen to answer, and immersed ourselves in the story he has chosen to tell.

Stay up-to-date on Skye's posts, new books, speaking engagements and more.


  • August 29, 2008

    Corbett Reeves

    I like this insight. I’ve always wondered about the backstory of evil/Satan but have never been very satisfied with most evangelical attempts to answer the question. I can’t help but think that Ez 28 is actually about the king of Tyre. Go figure.

  • August 29, 2008


    Wow. That is a very powerful piece of insight, indeed. I’ve been uncomfortable with the evangelical story of Satan for a long time, and this understanding seems to offer another alternative–something that after seeing it written out seems like I should have known it all along. I’m sure this though isn’t comprehensive and that there must be more to this on many different levels and in many different areas, but I’m pleased to read something about this from a different perspective than I have before.

  • September 5, 2008

    Mark Dillman

    Hi Skye! Great post about the Dark Knight. I found this funny because I went to see this movie with some guys from my church, including our young adults pastor, and we also thought this movie had some good nuggets that we could apply to theology and culture.

    We basically discussed how the Joker was absolutely right — when faced with a choice between morality and evil (or “chaos” in the movie), people will choose evil every time if the costs of those choices favor the evil. Just look at any corporate scandal! Or misbehaving athlete or celebrity! When the cost of evil is low (“Surely I can get away with this”) people choose it over morality every single time. The question is – where does our moral center come from? If your life is rooted in scripture and Jesus Christ, that’s an easy answer, but if not, what would one say? I guess it would have to boil down to Immanuel Kant type questions like, “If everyone behaved this way, would society be better or worse?” That’s fine and dandy, but that does not give a strong enough reason to choose the tougher moral choice over the easy evil path. Let’s face it, in that ferry scene in The Dark Knight, in the real world, one of those detonator buttons would have been pushed in about 2 seconds. Slightly off-topic, but I thought it was a wonderful twist that one of the boats was filled with prisoners. Does this give the normal citizens an easier moral justification for blowing up the other boat? Or does it make it more likely that the prisoners, presumably people of lesser moral character, will be quicker to press the button? Brilliant!

    About your question of the origin of evil, I guess I always assumed evil was a part of creation that was necessary for us to have free will. If we have freedom to choose to obey and worship God, then that freedom implies that we can choose the opposite – which would be evil, by definition.

    Anyway, I am enjoying reading your blog. Quality stuff here. It would be great to catch up with you guys sometime. Do you still have the Miata? =)

  • September 27, 2008

    Andy Dunn

    Skye – how come you don’t include links in your blog? I think you should if you aim to increase distribution of your ideas. When you say ‘check out Todd Hertz’s review’ it’s knee-jerk for me to expect a link to it. A friendly suggestion.

    Congratulations on your book. I’m impressed by the cover art. Very consumerist of me, I know.

  • September 27, 2008

    Skye Jethani

    I know, Andy. This was a post I wrote for another site a few weeks ago, When it was reposted here the links were dropped. I was too lazy to put them back in. I’ll correct that.

    So far everyone seems impressed with the book’s cover. I only hope the content doesn’t disappoint.

  • […] of the most popular blog posts I’ve written was a theological exploration of evil through the lens of the film, The Dark […]